Trump's Iran Dilemma: Escalation Fears Amidst Midterm Fallout and 'Cognitive Warfare'


This story, titled "Will Trump strike nuclear sites again as Iran engages ‘cognitive warfare’?" First published on Al Jazeera English and was retrieved from its original source on November 7, 2026.
Our site bears no responsibility for its content. You can review the details of this story at its original source.
Since the midterm elections on Tuesday, United States President Donald Trump has oscillated between threatening Iran and suggesting an imminent resolution to the conflict. Following a significant Republican defeat, which he partly attributed to his unpopular war with Iran, Trump stated on Thursday that the US might need to "destroy" the remainder of Iran, hinting at swift action. On Friday, US forces conducted what were described as "minor strikes" on Iranian air defense systems, with Iran's official news agency, IRNA, reporting two missiles hit Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz. However, on the same day, Trump also indicated ongoing discussions with Iranian representatives, telling reporters, "We’ve made a lot of progress with Iran." Analysts suggest that Iran's firm stance on its demands for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with Trump's midterm losses, has placed the US president in a precarious position.
Is the US in communication with Tehran?
Trump confirmed on Friday that the US is engaged in talks, stating, "We’re dealing with them now. They want to make a deal," though he offered no further specifics. On Saturday, Majed al-Ansari, spokesperson for the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs, refuted claims of failed negotiations between the US and Iran, warning that such rumors serve only those who wish to prolong the war.
Why has the US struck Qeshm Island again?
Trump acknowledged US military strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island on Friday, with Iranian state media reporting two missile strikes in the Suza area. This follows earlier "defensive strikes" on the island, identified as a key Iranian naval base housing "missile cities." The US asserts its targets are missile launch systems, with an unnamed US official telling AP on Monday that Washington conducted these strikes to prevent Iran from using surface-to-air missiles against US assets. Iranian state broadcaster IRIB also reported an Iranian army statement claiming its air defense forces intercepted and destroyed a US MQ-9 drone over the island. US Central Command (CENTCOM) stated the situation was "relatively calm" following reports of explosions on Qeshm.
Will the US target nuclear sites again?
Tehran appears to be preparing for such a possibility. The United Kingdom's Times newspaper reported that Iran is distributing iodine tablets to communities near its nuclear facilities, with a Ministry of Health official quoted as saying, "Trump can no longer be trusted. He may go through with this crime." These tablets are used to protect the thyroid from radiation. The newspaper also cited an Iranian political journalist who indicated officials were briefed that a US nuclear strike on the fortified Pickaxe Mountain site, believed to contain extensive underground facilities, is under serious consideration. Iran's Young Journalists Club (YJC) news agency reported on Friday that health authorities were distributing iodine tablets in Bushehr, home to Iran's sole operational nuclear power plant. Concurrently, the US State Department's Rewards for Justice program announced a reward of up to $20 million for information regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
What is Trump's current dilemma?
The dilemma stems from domestic politics and Iran's strategic responses. Trump faces significant opposition to the war from voters and within his own Republican Party, exacerbated by the loss of congressional control in the elections. He has consistently rejected Iran's conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz and resuming peace talks, which include lifting sanctions, unfreezing assets, ending the US naval blockade, and guaranteeing an end to attacks. Iran's strategy of retaliating against US-Israeli actions by striking bases in neighboring Gulf countries has weakened Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu domestically, limiting their options. Iran is now threatening to expand its retaliatory strikes beyond the Gulf. Hassan Ahmadian, an associate professor at the University of Tehran, noted that Trump lacks a clear understanding of how a limited strike would conclude, contributing to his hesitation and internal divisions. Ahmadian suggests that while Trump might still attack Iran, he seeks a decisive action that offers a "respectable way out" without escalating into an all-out war. Iran's "cognitive warfare" has reportedly left Trump uncertain about the consequences of limited conflict, necessitating a swift decision before January.
What lies ahead?
Uncertainty prevails, though both the US and Iran claim readiness for all scenarios. Axios quoted a US official stating that CENTCOM is preparing for renewed major military operations in Iran, awaiting Washington's orders. Tehran has warned of wider retaliation if the US resumes hostilities, with a spokesman for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force stating that any country aiding the US attack would be a legitimate target. Iran has also previously threatened attacks on cables, data centers, and artificial intelligence (AI) facilities in the Gulf region. Despite the strong rhetoric, diplomatic efforts are ongoing. On Thursday, Iran reportedly presented a new nuclear and peace proposal to the US via Qatari mediators, contingent on Washington meeting Tehran's seven demands. Reuters reported that the US is reviewing the proposal. Former Iranian diplomat Hadi Afghahi suggested that Tehran could facilitate a settlement with US flexibility, arguing that Trump wishes to avoid war due to its potential cost. However, Afghahi cautioned that Trump remains influenced by advisors, including the energy and treasury secretaries. Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani urged the US and Iran not to delay reaching a deal to end the conflict.
Politics
Politics
Politics
Politics