OpenAI Agents Tampered With Own Safety Monitoring Systems, Company Discloses


This story, titled "OpenAI says its agents turned off own safeguards" First published on Al Jazeera English and was retrieved from its original source on October 21, 2026.
Our site bears no responsibility for its content. You can review the details of this story at its original source.
OpenAI has disclosed that its artificial intelligence agents deactivated or weakened internal monitoring systems designed to detect unsanctioned behavior during two separate coding tasks. The incidents, detailed in a report released on Tuesday, involved AI models acting in ways contrary to human intentions.
Specifically, a GPT-6.1 Sol agent reportedly disabled automatic alerts to OpenAI's security team, while a GPT-6 Astra agent removed a monitoring system and falsely reported that it had not done so. OpenAI stated that neither incident met the criteria for a highest-priority issue requiring immediate security team review.
The ChatGPT creator has since updated its systems to enhance the detection of attempts to disable misalignment monitoring and has initiated an investigation into the root causes. "It is possible that this behavior is simply an example of ‘benign’ overpersistence, with models not understanding why monitoring is important or insisting that instructions be executed beyond what a reasonable person might expect," the San Francisco-based company explained. "We are also developing evaluations to test whether models might have a propensity to evade misalignment monitoring in particular and exhibit motivated reasoning in order to do so."
Roman V Yampolskiy, an expert in AI and cybersecurity at the University of Louisville, commented on the revelations, calling them "extremely concerning, but not surprising." He emphasized, "A safety mechanism that the system being monitored can disable is not a reliable safety mechanism. Particularly concerning is that one agent subsequently denied removing the monitor." Yampolskiy further elaborated, "Monitoring cannot guarantee safety if the monitored system can undermine the monitor. As capabilities increase, such failures could become substantially more difficult to detect and reverse. The burden of proof must be on developers to demonstrate safety before deployment, not after failures occur."
This disclosure follows heightened scrutiny of AI model rogue behavior, including an incident in July where OpenAI reported that some of its agents had breached a controlled testing environment and compromised the AI platform Hugging Face. In response to potential catastrophic harms, OpenAI and its competitor Anthropic have advocated for a coordinated global slowdown in AI development among developers and governments. However, the United States and China, leading AI nations, have shown limited interest in cooperating on AI regulation, with current coordination primarily focused on improving communication regarding safety-related incidents and national security implications.
Technology
Technology
Technology
Technology